Surveillance Technology Paradox in Private Security
Together with the rise of surveillance technology are the consequent rackets created by privacy advocates who question the moral and legal implications brought by the rising popularity of surveillance technology. Privacy, in this discussion, evolves on the liberty of executing activities with little restrictions… interest against intrusion…(and) information privacy (Kearns, 1999, p. 979). By this, privacy entails confidentiality and the ability to control information activities. Although the benefits of surveillance technology may have a considerable impact on peoples’ living conditions, its basic technique threatens the foundation of individual rights to privacy, possibly outweighing public welfare for private privileges.The handy concept of information technology applicably fits the dynamics employed in surveillance technique, increasing improvement in the general economy. According to Innes (2003, p. 123), society places the technique in surveillance at the top rank, with its coercive ability to trace the movement of consumers in the market, as well as business manipulation of workers’ behaviors. There is a predictive quality in fully operating the technology of surveillance. For one, Hess (2009, p. 166) explained that by periodically tracing the pattern of consumer behaviors, specific markets can arrive at pertinent market conclusions, either the products or services they offer yield positive feedbacks or not. Likewise, those engaged in profitable businesses can take full advantage of the techniques as employers in work areas can periodically monitor labor operations during a work period. In these circumstances, those in authority have measures to ensure that workers are following the set regulation of the organization, to the extent of listening to conversations shared by employees.